Delaware

Take a look at Delaware's Final Report!

DELAWARE TASK FORCE

Project Update! On January 29, 2014, Amy Quinlan of the Delaware Task Force participated in the RJIP's presentation at BJA's Enrichment Day. For the full presentation, click here.

On Monday, July 18th 2011 The Racial Justice Improvement Project Delaware Task Force held a workshop training event on Bias-Free Decision Making at the Dover Sheraton Hotel in Dover, Delaware. All Forty-Two Supervisors of the Delaware Probation Department were required to attend this training. The following members of the Delaware Task Force:  Curt Shockley, Director of Probation and Parole, Justice Henry DuPont Ridgley, and Colonel Robert Coupe, representing the Delaware State Police, presented during this day-long training. Special thanks to Delaware Task Force Members Amy Quinlan and Drewry Fennell.
                                     Agenda
                                        Photos

The Delaware Task Force examined probation violation practices in the state. The task force collected data that determined that Blacks are violated at a higher rate than similarly-situated white probationers. The Task Force has conducted a statewide training for probation officers on “bias-free decision making.”

Key Objectives of the Delaware Reform include:

Leveraging existing DACS functions and processes to include better tracking of demographic indicators associated with probation violations, sanctions and outcomes.
Providing the Probation Officer’s tools and information at their fingertips to make objective and informed decisions.
Providing a systematic guideline for imposing sanctions to offenders when completing a Violation Report. This includes Intake, Classification, Case Management and other security functions.
Providing the ability to generate statistical reporting on key indicators including gender, race, violations, level of violation, sanctions imposed and severity.

The following modifications have been developed in DACS to support the above objectives:

The existing Violation Report was modified to include graduated sanctions. The graduated sanctions system recommends to the Probation Officer a list of possible sanctions based on pre-defined criteria, including current level of supervision, severity of the violation and number of previous violations.
The existing reporting (LSI-R, Progress Reports, Violation Reports and Admin Warrants) was modified to include demographic information including race, gender and lead charge.
The existing Violation Report was modified to include the Recommended Level of Supervision on the printed reports.
The List of Probation Violation Report, List of Progress Reports and List of Admin Warrants was modified excel downloads to include the case closing method.

The implementation of these functions provides the Department with a tool to better manage its offender population and enables the implementation of operational efficiencies. Furthermore, these changes provides the Probation Officers with a guideline that drives the sanctions based on predefined, objective criteria.

Final Evaluation Findings:

Prior to the implementation of the new DACS graduated sanctions system, ten state probation officers were interviewed using an open-ended questionnaire.
After the implementation of the graduated sanctions protocol, the new DACS recording system and the implicit bias training, a random sample of probation officers were asked to participate in an online survey about their perceptions of the new graduated sanctions and DACS systems. Thirty-two probation officers participated in the survey.
All interviewed probation officers indicated that they used graduated sanctions regularly and believed that the system helped in their supervision.
The officers interviewed mostly stated that they anticipated the new automated DACS recording system will be a positive improvement in the graduated sanctions process. As the primary benefits, interviewees cited the ability to easily review cases and access updates in real time for probationers as the primary benefits.
Post-reform, officers tended to agree that the DACS system was helpful and beneficial to their jobs.
To evaluate whether the RJIP reforms were effective in reducing racial disparities in probation violations, we looked at the rates of probation violations before and after the reforms.
Post-reform, the disproportionate number of Black probation violations was reduced at this data collection period.
For the full report, click here.

Delaware Task Force Meets with CSOSA

Delaware Racial Justice Task Force Meeting with the CSOSA Agenda
Delaware Racial Justice Task Force Meeting with the CSOSA Recap

Data and Resources
Outcome Evaluation Plan, please click here.
2013 Individual Level II and III VOPs Data, please click here.
2011 Comparison of VOPs to Probation Population by Race.
PO Survey Data for Report, please click here.
Data Report, please click here.
Declaration of Leading Practices, please click here.
2013 Online survey, please click here.

Current Events in the Delaware Area

Delaware Supreme Court and Delaware Criminal Justice Council Co-Sponsored Summit on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Criminal Justice System (Delaware Courts Press Release, Sept. 12, 2007)

Data Collection

Analysis of Wilmington, DE Crime Data

Wilmington – 2007 Crime Rates (Summary)

Delaware Minority Contact Report

Race and Incarceration in Delaware

Relevant Links and Documents

Press Release ABA RJIP Sept, 9, 2010
Press Release ABA RJIP October 25, 2011
Delaware Center for Justice
Delaware Criminal Justice Counsel Membership
The State of Sentencing 2011 - Developments in Policy and Practice

This website is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this website (including without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided).